District Court Overturns Haas Ruling Click here to return to VBA Site Map.
Material found herein should not be interpreted as legal advice.     Legal Disclaimer Notices
Equality for those that served in the Navy offshore

Real Losers:   U.S. Navy Personnel and those that served offshore
Why?     Try claiming source of exposure due to distilled drinking water ..
rotsa luck ...
Groundwater contamination due to toxins/agent orange
A sad day for bluewater sailors ...   (blog)
Source:   VNVETS.blog

U.S. Court of Appeals for Federal Circuit
See Opinions & Orders for May 8, 2008
(Haas v. Peake; origin CAVC*)
Appeal Decision     Landmark Ruling

* Lower Court Ruling Overturned (CAVC):   Court of Appeals for Veterans ** Claims

** Navy personnel need not apply!   <d>>>

Barton F. Stichman, National Veterans Legal Services Program, of Washington, DC, argued for claimant-appellee. With him on the brief was Louis J. George.

Todd M. Hughes, Assistant Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent-appellant. With him on the brief was Jeanne E. Davidson, Director. Of counsel on the brief were David J. Barrans, Deputy Assistant General Counsel, and Ethan G. Kalett, Staff Attorney, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, of Washington, DC.

Judge William A. Moorman

Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, BRYSON, Circuit Judge, and FOGEL, District Judge.*

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge BRYSON.

Dissenting opinion filed by District Judge FOGEL.

Buk Frank, Your Veteran Advocate Email Joe to set up an appointment today! "Buk" Frank
Vet Advocate
(702) 363-3290
Political Meter
Army Engineers
697th "Pipeline"
Army Bio

Lady Justice marred by the V.A.