Legal Disclaimer Notice: Lawyers dispense legal advice; veteran advocates
provide advice only. It is up to you do decide whether you agree with and/or act
on these suggestions. Advocates, unless otherwise explicitly stated,
are not attorneys of law and not licensed to practice law under any conditions.
If you need an attorney, please check your phone book.
Some Appeal Cases approved at
"Serving in Thailand" for more information.
Camp Friendship - Korat
"There was no herbicide activity .. in Korat."
Sept'68 - Sept'70
Plumber's Work
55-gal Drums
(See Full Report below.)
Reported by Mark Olson, 528th Engr Det, Plumber
On a regular basis, Mark would retrieve from a storage area near the
31st Field Hospital chemical drums to be used for various purposes such as taking a 3 inch pipe
and retrofit for shower factilities around the camp. That's right .. showers.
It isn't bad enough that the water table in Korat (and other military camp areas
in Thailand were contaminated for decades to come by high toxin govt chemicals allegedly not
sprayed .. we just have a nack of finding dessert in the jungles of Thailand .. but GI's were served
up with steel drums that held chemicals shipped in from Satahip .. sound familiar?
It should .. drums "popping" up all over, eg, Hua Hin .. airfields .. deep water port .. ummh ..
(liability) cover-up .. Uncle Sam loves you.
Plumber (expert) testimony: you can clean those drums, but the steel will always hold residue
from the original (high) toxin content, ie, traces; traces=equals exposure and traces = you're fucked.
But, don't take my word for it. Thailand veterans have claimed such "encounters" over
the years and the court and the V.A. have (emphatically) denied it. Who do you trust?
What evidence do they need? How do they expect a veteran (a plumber) to
verify such findings? U.S. GOVERNMENT COVERS UP AT VETERANS' EXPENSE.
Search engines -- spider that. Congress/VA Secretary/administrators .. "spin" on this...
Note: nomenclature-wise, the use of the word "drum" versus "barrel" is interchangeable here
for all practicle purposes.
Full Report
Building Hot Water Heaters out 55 gallon Barrels
I was a MOS 51K20, which is a Plumber. My background beyond the U.S. Army, I became a Plumbing Contractor 17 years and a Journeyman Plumbing for over 30 years. I was also a Welder for about 4 yrs. I took Auto Mechanics, while attending North Dakota State College of Science. I took the Plumbing Coarse at North Dakota State School of Science in Wahpeton, ND. I received a Certificate with a Grade Point Average of 3.935. I'll be connecting being a plumber, welder and mechanic later in this statement.
I was a License Plumbing Contractor in Utah for 17 years, a Licenses Journeyman Plumber in Utah, Montana, Colorado, and North Dakota combined this is over 30 years.
I was a plumber for the majority of time, while I was in Thailand. I was also a MOS 76P40, which is a Stock Control Accounting Specialist. I operated RT6000 Forklift, 5 Ton Tractor Truck & Lowboy, and 5 Ton Dump Truck. Being a Stock Control Accounting Specialist, I worked the S-4 Logistics Yard of 809th Engineer Battalion, Operating the RT-6000 Forklift. I had a 5 Ton Dump Truck assigned, which I would move Soil, Materials for Plumbing, Sand and All Types of Fill, Etc.
55 gallon Barrels were used in building Hot Water Heaters. These Hot Water Heaters were used in the Shower & Lavatory Areas of the Troop Hooch Areas.
These 55 gallon Barrels weren't designed to start out as Hot Water Heaters. These Barrels contained, whatever was shipped to Thailand. These would be found at Cam Points. Cam Points were at all U.S. Military Bases or Camps. Cam Points are where all kinds of Metals, were taken as Junk.
The 55 gallon Barrels were piled in an area at Cam Point. Plumbers would take whatever barrels, that would be needed to build Hot Water Heaters. There were NO regulations on what barrels could be used FOR.
Plumbers and Welders would then build the Hot Water Heaters. First: the barrel would be fitted at the center with 3" galvanized pipe, which would be welded into the center of the barrel. Second: two 1" galvanized pipe each would be placed half way from the center to the rim of the barrel, which be welded into the barrel. The two pipes would a length of 8" for the Hot Water and 6" from the bottom for the Cold Water. A fourth Hole which was fitted thread fitting for a Temperature and Pressure Value. This would complete turning the barrel into a Hot Water Heater. There was a hole made for a sensor for burner workings for temperature control.
There was the burner workings, which are separate from Hot Water Heater Tank.
This is where I'll state some very important facts about Steel.
Steel is a porous metal. 55 gallon barrels isn't highly finished steel, like highly finished auto engine parts. When Zmax or Prolong which penetrate the pores. There lays the Problems with using 55 gallon barrels, which contents were Chemicals of every type. While being a welder at few plants. I saw what cutting oils would leave behind. After welding these parts would be washed with chemicals, so parts could be painted.
NO barrels would ever become clean while in use with water.
Story Update
Email first - "This my knowlegde about the 33 Gallon Barrels.
Because the contents, they were very hard to get
clean. There was also Motor Oils and etc.
The water would always have a film on it with these Barrels."
33 Gallon Barrels of Asphalt
These Barrels were usually Black in Color. It was called Asphalt, but it was an asphalt harder.
While working at S-4 Logistics 809th Engr Bn would have to go TDY to Bangkok to Texaco.
Pick up a 5 Ton Dump Truck load of Asphalt Barrels.
Taking the load to the Asphalt Plant, A CO 809th Engr Bn.
I know, which Barrels were used from the 33 Gallon Barrels to the 55 Gallon Barrels.
There was something, I just thought about the hot
water heaters. They were also connected to the
Lavatory Sinks. Any Hot Water use there would have
affected everyone shaving and etc.
The Chemicals could have an effect on Acne.
Mark O. Olson
44th Engineer Group, USARSUPTHAI
17 Sept 1968-17 Sept 1970
"Huh .. you got anything besides that orange shampoo???
My hair is beginning to fall out..."
"Look mom! No more acne!!!"
|
|
Notice: this article has been sanitized, scrubbed and certifiable for GI use only.
Everyone else, use at your own health risk .. ask your physician first...
GI Warning: while showering, do not drink the water.
|
Legal Disclaimer:
You may not agree with .. the assertions or allegations herein ..
but, 500,000 sick soldiers don't lie...
Visit website notes @
VSPA Site/Courtesy of TVVET
Exposure to AO while
serving in Thailand
See "Southeast Asia" inference..
Claim Supporting Documents
See also DFAS (CZ) and
R & R in Thailand for Vietnam Personnel
At one point, military authorities proposed establishing a Thailand-based spray capability;[10] whether this ever occurred is unknown, although herbicide tests were conducted at Thai air bases as early as 1964-65.[11]"
Footnotes:
[10] Agenda Item for SEACORD meeting, August 19, 1969; Disposition Form to Chief of Staff, Subject: Defoliation Operation, January 18, 1969 (declassified).
[11] Deutsche Presse-Agentur (Bangkok), “United States denies Thai dumpsite contains Agent Orange,” April 22, 1999.
FYI, this article was written in an "expanded version" August, 2002 by Andrew Wells-Dang.
I'd say a few years after "the cat was let out of the bag."
In govt-lingo, that's "de-classified."
"Whether defoliation continued after 1970 remains an open question. As a result of increased public outcry, restrictions began to be placed on herbicide use by the US military. In March 1971, Secretary of Defense Melvin Laird requested that he personally approve any herbicide operations in “Laos, Cambodia, or Thailand.”[31] Air Force records show that UC-123 planes, whose sole purpose had been listed as “defoliation,” conducted 860 sorties over Laos from January-June 1971, but no further details are given.[32]"
Footnotes:
[31] Buckingham, p. 178.
[32] 7th Air Force, Monthly Command Status Reports, June 1969-December 1970 (declassified).
Well, that's got me sprayed .. I mean, "covered." .. January, 1970.
.. none of this "early 60's b.s."
.. a reference to Footnote [10] and the quote above, in red .. 1964-65 .. right.
"Also unconfirmed is herbicide use by Air America or the CIA, whose records are still closed.[33] In an April 1968 interview, the vice-president of Air America declared that his company had been contracted by the Department of Defense to defoliate vegetation in Vietnam, Laos, and southern Thailand, based from the Udon Thani airbase.[34] The 1971-3 opium destruction missions were probably carried out on this basis, and secondary sources also report that the CIA had spray mission capability.[35] Air Force records do not list any UC-123 aircraft at Udon Thani during this period, suggesting that other aircraft might have been used; however, 7 UC-123’s were present at the Nakhon Phanom airbase in 1970 and 1971, presumably for defoliation purposes.[36] Further research is needed to confirm the extent of additional herbicide use in Laos."
Footnotes:
[33] For more information on missing data, see Andrew Wells-Dang, Roger Rumpf, and Jacqui Chagnon, “The Secret Spraying of Herbicides in Laos and Cambodia,” Interchange, Spring 2002 (http://www.ffrd.org/indochina/news.html#herbicides).
[34] Jacques Decornoy, “Une compagnie privee americaine participe a la lutte contra la guerilla,” Le Monde (Paris), April 20, 1968, p. 2.
[35] Robert Kaylor, “Despite Critics, Defoliation Continues in Vietnam,” Los Angeles Times, January 4, 1970, p. E10.
[36] 7th Air Force, Monthly Command Status Reports, June 1969-December 1970.
See Assertions by Veterans of Herbicide Spraying in Thailand
VSM Legal Precedence (16 Aug 06)
Or the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) that preceded the VSM
This landmark decision sets aside the definition of "service in 'Nam"
Over-turns any attempt by the VA to limit benefits to Vietnam-era Veterans
Or the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) that preceded the VSM
NOTICE (15 Sep 06 Update)
.. take the above link to learn more about this landmark decision.
|
Did you know .. .. that Korat was going to be
.. a major repository for thousands of drums
of chemical herbicides?
Here are a few 44th Engineer Group (Construction) Reports, ie, "Lessons Learned" (de-classified)
mentioning this project, for drum storage.
Project started third quarter of 1966.
Army Disposition Form dtd 17 Oct 66; signed Jack B. Matthews, Colonel, GS
Operational Report for Quarterly Period 31 Jul 66
Mission: The 44th Engineer Group continued its mission of providing constructional support
for the 9th Logistical Command.
(c) New Projects: The following projects were assigned to the group during
the period: (2) Korat POL Drum Storage (9LC 66-30)
An open storage facility designed to approx 21,000 55-gallon drums in racks;
includes drums and access road. Estimated cost is $10,000.
Project is now 20% complete.
Troop Dispositions Chart for Period
Projects - (7) Korat Drum Storage and (8) Korat POL Facility
Operational Report of Lessons Learned for the Quarterly Period Ending 31 Oct 66 dtd 2 Nov 66; signed
Carl F. Trial, Major CE, Adjutant (De-classified)
Pg-6 (d) Canceled Projects: (2)
Korat POL Drum Storage Yard: This project consisted of the construction of twenty 70'x70' storage pads
with drainage structures and protecting berns. Although not completed to the extent indicated
in the job directive, the project was subsequently cancelled by the 9th Log Cmd on 8 Sep 66.
See "Thailand Exposed"
Decision Date: 11/28/03
697th Engineer Co (Pipeline)
History
of the 44th Engineer Group (Construction)
Another unit vet,
John Strain, forwarded some "9th Log News" articles to me
(predecssor of "SUPTHAI SENTINAL.")
697th did not just lay pipe. POL tanks, water tanks, storage pads, hootches
-- we did it; all over Thailand. These clips were around the time, 2 Sep 66,
when the Drum Storage Yard Project in Korat was cancelled .. not a sick guy there.
Herm's Hutch Builders (more common spelling: "hootch")
Welcome new C.O.
Final touches on a water tank for the 31st Field Hospital -
(Partial Clip)
re: asphault drums were smaller .. 33 gallons .. used in road construction
- Lt Lee Peters, 697th See
Quarterly Operation Reports

Source:
Korat Post
Send your "Did You Know.." info to Franco @
Email; photo evidence welcomed too.
See Sample Inquiry, and
this Research.
p.s. An unsubstantiated report of drums being unearth at Korat RTAFB for extending the runway(s).
"There was no herbicide activity .. in Korat."
I was assigned to NKP in 73-74, I was eXposed to the TCDD or other chemicals while there. I was a Heavy Weapons Leader and we trained in this stuff. We responded to emergencies in this junk. Also, I would like to say that one of the problems they had in this region of Thailand and Laos I don't see any body mention, was Malaria carring Masquitios, and one the best ways to control these bugs was to keep the vegatation down. All around the Perimater the vegatation was controled and the ground most places were dirt, my point is nothing grew up the side of the trees located on the east side of the weapons stroage area, or along the fence lines etc. Klongs etc. etc. all the way back into the jungle. If you were to see pictures now, the jungle has reclaimed most of this, however at the time it was controled. I believe my body absorbed some of the jucies.
Source: Curtis D. Hammond Link
(Military Dog Handler Forum - same for below)
>My name is Warren Maynard and I was stationed at Korat 71-72. They used a fogger machine at night, they say
to kill insect and vegetation. The fogging machine would choke the GI's who was around the immeidate
area, after they sprayed. I too have a claim in for agent orange because of being a diabetic. If you have
any knowledge or more information please contact me. Thank you
My Name is Arthur Lewis Jr. I served in Korat, Thailand in the 388th MMS Sq. from March 1973-September 1975. During that time I was often ordered to SP Augmentee duty. I was posted at several towers and bunkers around the base. From the towers, I could see many bare/brown areas very near the perimeter areas I was responsible for guarding. I noticed that they never needed to be attended to by the grass cutter details that were contracted to the base. I also noticed a bunch of barrels of stuff located at the O-6 end of the runway (I think this was the right designator. I couldn't swear to what was in them). I had a six month break in service, then I enlisted in the Army. I now have type II Diabetes diagnosed in October 2005). I was told, during a PRP physical (At this time I was in the Army in Germany) that I was borderline diabetic and hypertensive. I now know (Having looked back at my medical records) that I had diabetes and high blood pressure when I was 25 years old and was not treated for it. I stayed in the hootches at he far rear of the base; and I too remember the foggers used for that purpose. Thank you for your time, and may God bless all of you guys-ladies.
Arthur Lewis
VSPA website
Viet-REMF "In the rear with the gear"
How about Okinawa .. base spraying?
I served in Okinawa in 1961-62 at which
time we began a massive build-up of
supplies and ordnance which included
herbicides known as 2, 4, D and 2, 4, 5,
T. The combined product of these two
chemicals was a 50-50 mix which was then
mixed 50-50 with diesel fuel and given
the code name “Agent Orange”, for the
orange band that was used to mark the
drums it was stored in. The purpose of
the product was to deny an enemy cover
and concealment in dense terrain by
defoliating trees and shrubbery where the
enemy could hide. In Okinawa we had
other uses for it, particularly near base
camp perimeters. Spraying from both
truck and back pack were utilized along
roadways too. The term “Agent Orange” was
at the time merely one of several used to
identify various herbicides used in the
South Pacific. Others included Agents
White, Blue, Purple, Pink and Green.
Agent Orange was used by far the most.
It was my job, MOS-3531 Motor Transport
operator (see DD-214 #25 A&B as evidence)
to transport troops and cargo. On many
occasions the cargo was herbicides known
as 2-4-D and 2-4-5T. Sometimes they were
full and sometimes they were empty.
Sometimes the drums were half full of a
50-50 mix of herbicides and I would have
to take them and add the remaining 50% of
diesel fuel or kerosene for better
dispersion. On many occasions while
handling the drums the contents would get
on my hands and clothing and when we were
spraying along the roadways by truck and
back pack the wind would change and blow
the herbicides onto our skin and
clothing. The thing that bothers me the
most is that we were not told or warned
about the hazards of the herbicides that
we were handling nor were we issued any
protective clothing such as gloves and
etc. I believe that the frequent
exposure to the concentrated unmixed
herbicides was much more hazardous than
if I would have been sprayed with a
diluted thin down mixture.
[that] Army
Personnel or other military sources would be able in any
event to verify the filling of, and mixing of solvents in, 55
gallon drums with herbicides in Okinawa for use in this
particular time period, including as a part of Operation
Ranchhand].
Thus, the only significant issue to be resolved is whether he
was in fact exposed to dioxins in service. The evidence in
this regard may not be independently verifiable or
overwhelming, but the aggregate data is entirely consistent
therewith. In that regard, the Board finds that the
veteran’s explanations for the gaps in the otherwise
contemporaneously documented information of record in that
regard are quite credible. He has provided a comprehensive
description of the activities through which he was exposed to
concentrated dioxins, as well as the reasons why the mixing
of the concentrated chemicals with diesel fuel or other
agents was necessary. [Parenthetically, it is unnecessary in
this context to address his opinion that the dioxin in its
concentrated state, i.e., before he mixed it, was more toxic
than the dispersed version sprayed as a defoliant in whatever
location for whatever purpose].
These asserted facts mesh well with those more readily
recognizable things for which there is no need for
verification, i.e., why the secondary chemicals utilized for
dilution of the concentrates, such as diesel fuel or
kerosene, would have been most readily, and perhaps almost
exclusively, available in the environment in which the
veteran then worked.
They also make good common sense when placed next to the
known problems such as the ongoing rain in the Far East
during that portion of the year which made the requirement
for nonsoluble defoliants a reality in the first place. All
are entirely believable and consistent with the other known
information.
The service department has verified that the veteran was
indeed where he said he was, at a time when military build-up
from a support standpoint was considerable, doing a job which
was entirely consistent with the mixing and other transport
of herbicides, and at a time when these were both used and
warnings not necessarily given, as he stated, since the
hazards were not fully understood. He can scarcely be
faulted for the nonverifiability of specific practices in the
so-called Okinawan theater of operations. His assertions in
that regard are both reasonable and justifiable and appear
both sound and factually accurate, all of which raises a
certain premise from which conclusions may be reasonably
drawn. It is exactly such situations in which the Court has
mandated that the Board make judgments with regard to
ultimate and relative credibility, which in this case, the
Board finds in the affirmative.
Thus, having concluded that the veteran was exposed to
herbicides while assigned to motor transport duties in
Okinawa in 1961-2, not coincidentally concurrent with other
entirely reasonable circumstances enumerated by the veteran,
the Board finds that a doubt is thus raised which must be
resolved in his favor, and in so doing, that service
connection must be granted for prostate cancer as being the
result of Agent Orange exposure under pertinent exceptions to
the regulations. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1110, 5107; 38 C.F.R. §§
3.303, 3.307, 3.309.
ORDER
Service connection for prostate cancer due to Agent Orange
exposure is granted.
Source:
VBA 9800877 (Granted)
See HadIt.com Forum.

It is now past 10-22-05, and my disability claim was just sent to RO/Reno, Nevada
that was filed on 04-21-05. Simple math, 6 months.
It is a straight-forward claim of exposure to agent orange and presumptive disease
of diabetes type II during the Vietnam War period incorporated into the CFR
requirements.
All requirements of evidence and documents have been presented and then some idiots
at the VAAO/Las Vegas (Assistance Office) are asking for my DD214 (covering the
period evidence for CZ) and VAMC medical records from Long Beach.
The later was stated in a supporting claim statement VA form o/a 06-08-05 and
the DD214, in question, was filed along with the initial claim on 04-21-05.
Could said idiots respond to my questions why the delays and/or request for such
documents was made at this time, 10-13-05; of course not. The VA
representative that I "discussed" my complaints with also added that my file
(that day) was also sent to VARO/Reno. Pausing, for a deep breath,
I then asked: "Why? -- in so much as you were still asking for
additional medical records from VAMC/LB and a small matter of the DD214.
Again, as expected, could not explain these discrepancies away.
There will be more about my claim as it unfolds and evidence
of negligence on the VAAO/Las Vegas office is discovered. It has
been two weeks now since I hand-carried my initial 10-page complaint and over
a week since my certified/return receipt has been made asking for the VA forms
that make up my claim, half a dozen; not my supporting documents of
evidence or medical records. Is there anyone out there surprised?
I've got a bridge in ..
"Evidence of Service in Vietnam" may seem elusive
to many of you, but did you keep a pay stub or vaccination record (stamped) in Vietnam?
The laws and rules (regs) regarding "presumptive" is in your favor with
regards to "stepping foot in Vietnam" .. even where the plane you landed on/in just
had the damn doors open !
Being awarded the Vietnam Service Medal is not adequate
support of your claim !
More on the history of the Army Engineers that
served in Thailand.
Thailand Vietnam Veterans for Equal Treatment
(TVVET)
Visit website notes @
VSPA Site/Courtesy of TVVET
Exposure to AO while serving in Thailand
See "Southeast Asia" inference..
I served two tours in Thailand with the army engineers during the entire years of
1968 and 1969; departure in January, 1970. I also stepped foot in
Vietnam three (3) separate incidents and what follows does not apply to my claim,
but as a concerned veterans' advocate, I am doing all the research possible on
data that may assist those less fortunate in filing their claims for compensation
for disabilities related to exposure of agent orange. I won't capitalize
agent orange -- it isn't the capital of a country, or much different than apples'n
oranges .. plain toxins .. crap .. shit.
"Hoo-ah!"
What's up with this ?! De .. de .. de-classified ..
"Counter Insurgency Ops" ..
"..experiences of unit engaged in"
(44th Engineer Group)
More on the history of the Army Engineers that
served in Thailand.
Hey ! "Transporters" -- were you on those (sprayed) roads ???
Route #22 from Sakon Nakon to NKP .. .. Udorn .. Satahip
See project map .. official document, and keep in
mind that the VA Board of Appeals has already approved claims of service personnel
stationed at NKP AB, 18 km from NKP.
Confused? More routes???
Take a look at this (declassified) project map
.. another official document .. 19 Oct 67 USARSUPTHAI FY 68 Project Asia Contingency Funds (Special Loc Funding Requirements)
This sucka goes all the way from NKP to Satahip ...
Northeast Map
Project Priorities Map.
"FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY" /// DE-CLASSIFIED
Info Brief dtd 22 Apr 68
Subj: Engineer Organization and Activities, Thailand
Quote/
DISCUSSION
1. The 44th Engineer Group, Construction, subordinates to Headquarters
U.S. Army Support Group, Thailand, commads 2 construction battalions,
1 construction company, 3 support companies and 12 detachment size units.

2. Currently units are engaged in constructing roads between Satahip
Phanom, Kabin-Buri to Korat, upgrading roads in Northeast Thailand,
constructing an Army cantonament near Satahip, and constructing a POL
facility at Nakhon Phanom. In support of the Royal Thai Army buildup
to deploy troops to Vietnam, the 809th Engineer Battalion (Const) is
constructing a Thai Army cantonament at Kanchanaburi, 60 miles North-
west of Bangkok.
3. To assist in construction of a pipeline, one platoon from the
697th Engineer Company, Pipeline Construction Support has been sent
to Korea TCS for 60 days.
Authority/Military Engineering Div/OCE MAJ Kocienda/74616
For more on the history of the 697th,
click here.
"3rd Herd" heads for Korea!
How about a project in Vietnam?
Qui Nhon to An Khe
in support of the 1st Cav Ops
in Central Vietnam
(An Khe) !
How about today, in Iraq ??? "Pipe - anyone?"
1969 - Satahip Cantonment Area /
Depot was a dessert.
That's right .. not a weed anywhere .. today (as of 2004) -- jungle, babe.
Satahip Projects.
Thailand Route Map
FYI, Sample Unit Chart @ 44th 22 Apr 69
.. just prior to "Counter Insurgency" Ops .. identified previously.
"I smell 'Class Action Lawsuit' via VA claim processing procedures..."
More research is warranted on this. Stay tuned.
On face-value, benefit of the doubt clause of VCAA 2000, grounds for approval
of service-connected disability claim, men.
Source: Army Engineer School History Dept., Ft Leonard Wood, Missouri
On the "Lighter Side" .. our government would
never cover up facts because of disability
liability .. would they?
"Hey -- Sarge, can we run down to Bangkok
to get some more of that supa dupa weed
killer stuff, in a drum?
We're (plum) all out.
"Have you killed a GI today? Well, what's your problem?!
Find one -- azap!"
And, Moses said:
"Clear the jungle," and like magic (no spray or nothin,)
it was done. Let it be written; let it be told.
Think about it, for a minute, jungles .. world trade center
.. truck loads. How many dump truck loads would it take?
"You guys -- get back to work! You can clear that shit by hand!"
A Jungle without defoliant sucks .. See Incl 7. "Damn, girly-men."
"You better get your 'cover' on, unless you want to catch a cold!"
"Damn -- you guys did a helluva job clearing out all those
weeds and stuff, do ya think we need more spray?"
"Hi Ho Hi HO It's off to spray the jungles, we go.."
"Look -- Mom! No hands!" Herb .. Herbicides! .. in gallons
Never except the immitation. Purchased in the drum-size to kill more G.I.s
F.D.A. approved U.S.A.F. endorsed
Manufactured by DOW Chemical, a company you can trust to get the job done.
See excerpts of "Benefit of the Doubt" Rule of Law
found in USC Title 38 § 5107 VA Claim Assistance Act of 2000
- signed by President William Clinton
(prior to leaving office on 9 Nov 00.)
For complete text of bill, see Congressional Act of 2000.
Filed already; been denied???
CFR Title 38 References
§ 3.6 Duty Periods.
§ 3.102 Reasonable Doubt.
§ 3.103 Procedural due process and appellate rights.
§ 3.104 Finality of decisions.
§ 3.105 Revision of decisions.
§ 3.110 Computation of time limit.
§ 3.155 Informal claims.
§ 3.156 New and material evidence.
§ 3.159 Department of Veterans Affairs assistance in developing claims.
§ 3.300 Claims based on the effects of tobacco products.
§ 3.303 Principles relating to service connection. V.A. Reviewer
§ 3.304 Direct service connection; wartime and peacetime.
§ 3.305 Direct service connection; peacetime service
before January 1, 1947.
§ 3.306 Aggravation of preservice disability.
§ 3.307 Presumptive service connection for chronic, tropical
§ 3.309 Disease subject to presumptive service connection.
§ 3.310 Proximate results, secondary conditions.
See "Kidney Disorder Case", ie, CRF (Chronic Renal Failure)
Also Secondary Conditons Case w/Award VBA Case No. 9412692
Another Fine Case VBA Case No. 9832924 Moody v. Principi
§ 3.313 Claims based on service in Vietnam.
See U.S.C. References of Title 38
V.A. Reviewer Searching USC
§ 101 Definitions
§ 1101 Definitions
§ 1110 Basic entitlement
§ 1111 Presumption of sound condition
§ 1112 Presumptions relating to certain diseases and disabilities
§ 1116 Presumptions of service connection for diseases
§ 1137 Wartime presumptions for certain veterans
§ 1153 Aggravation V.A. Reviewer
§ 1154 Consideration to be accorded time, place,
and circumstances of service
CHAPTER 5 - AUTHORITY AND DUTIES OF THE SECRETARY
Specific Sections re in Chapter 5
§ 501 Rules and regulations
§ 511 Decisions of the Secretary; finality
CHAPTER 51 - CLAIMS, EFFECTIVE DATES, AND PAYMENTS
Specific Sections re in Chapter 51
§ 5100 Definition of "claimant"
§ 5102 Application forms furnished upon request; notice to
claimants of incomplete applications
§ 5103A Duty to Assist Claimants
§ 5103 Notice to claimants of required information and evidence
§ 5107 Claimant responsibility; benefit of the doubt
§ 5107 Benefit of the Doubt @ Your Advocate
§ 5108 Reopening disallowed claims
§ 5109 Independent medical opinions
§ 5109A Revision of decisions on grounds of clear
and unmistakable error
§ 5126 Benefits not to be denied
based on lack of mailing address
§ 7104 Jurisdiction of the Board
§ 7105 Filing of notice of disagreement and appeal
§ 7252 Jurisdiction; finality of decisions
§ 7266 Notice of Appeal
This de-classified military document is grounds for appeal of same,
imho. You don't need an attorney to see thru this bull.
Warning to Lawyers: any attorney that feels that providing vital
information to my fellow veterans is "dispensing" legal advice
will find their letter published here and a big fat warning
to all veterans not to retain same. Intimidation is not for soldiers.
Lawyer: "Who are you???"
Moi: .. yah'worse nightmare, mate.
Some lawyers may think that if you didn't go
to Law School, you have shit-for-brains...
Try me. This Bostonian luv's a good fight.
This g.i. went to school the hard way; paid
for by sweat'n hard work in the army.
Some aerospace engineers that I ran into
while attending U.S.C. and graduate studies
showed me what arrogance is all about. Hah!
I dropped out with a 4.0 g.p.a. "Hoo-ah!"
"Endless Summer" - 1984
Photo: visiting family in Bangkok @ Wat Arun (1984)
.. just returned from a surfin safari in Western Australia
Programmer
for the Association of Surfing Professionals (ASP)
and the National Scholastic Surfing Assoc (NSSA)
Resume - Data Processing Rare Birds
Today - Shop Las Vegas
You need to read over the details found at the web URLs that I am providing here.
I will add more and provide more in the way of opinions, none which
of course, may be interpretted as legal assistance because I am not a lawyer.
1) Visit website notes @
VSPA Site/Courtesy of TVVET
2)
Visit VA Site for pertinent (Thailand)
appeal case @
VetApp99
There are some discrepancies in the findings and facts
presented in support of his approved case, but because they are not completely
accurate is not really the issue.
The issue is exposure of agent
orange and I, for one, believe that many individuals assigned to not only
NKP (Nakhon Panom,) but Thailand military bases was exposed.
Discrepancies noted: Thailand is not on the border of Vietnam.
Thailand borders Laos and Cambodia and the Mekong River is the primary separator
along the border of Laos and Thailand. Yes -- there were reported
attacks on bases in Thailand, but nothing that could be substantiated in the appeal
brief.
The Ho Chi Minh Trail (or Trails) referred to in the appeal, generally speaking,
run along the Laos / Vietnam border, far from NKP...
Military bases in Thailand -- see
"A Little Courage"
The use of defoliants/toxins in Thailand are not discussed very much.
Why? I'm not sure. Possibly such military ops were subject
to classification and the "well-being (or better -- wealth) of the U.S. govt" because
there have been some reports (or scandals) uncovered in Thailand, specifically (years
later) the plans for a commercial airport in Hua Hin for tourism development.
See the following articles/links for more details on
"Buried but alive: Agent Orange is still on active duty in Thailand"
(November, 1999) and
"U.S. Government tries to hide Agent Orange use in Thailand"
(June 24, 2002.)
For more interesting reading, try these articles:
THAI NGO DEMANDS U.S. ACTION ON AGENT ORANGE
(July 14, 1999)
AO Tests in Thailand during "early" 60's
-- caught ! (..compiled in 1979)
An estimated 3.1 million veterans served in the Southeast Asia Theater (Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, flight crews based in Thailand, and sailors in the South China Sea).
VA Fact Sheet
(March, 2000)
.. air crews in Thailand .. sailors in South China Sea
Now, that's a way of limiting liability !!!
AO Usage in Thailand?
Asia News -- How about the entire (freakin) Vietnamese population
and a court judge dismissing their claims,
details;
Apocalypse Still.
Quote /
A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit Thursday charging that American chemical companies committed war crimes against some 4 million Vietnamese citizens by making Agent Orange, the military defoliant that allegedly caused birth defects, miscarriages and cancer.
"There is no basis for any of the claims of plaintiffs under the domestic law of any nation or state or under any form of international law," U.S. District Judge Jack B. Weinstein in Brooklyn wrote in a 233-page ruling. "The case is dismissed."
Lawyers who filed the lawsuit on behalf of the Vietnamese citizens argued that Agent Orange, which is laden with the highly toxic chemical dioxin, was a poison barred by international rules of war.
/ Unquote
"VA does have significant information regarding Agent Orange use in Korea along the DMZ. DoD has confirmed that Agent Orange was used from April 1968 up through July 1969 along the DMZ."
Details.
"Unlike Viet Nam, exposure to Agent Orange is not presumed for veterans who served in Korea. Claims for compensation for disabilities resulting from Agent Orange exposure from veterans who served in Korea during this period will be developed for evidence of exposure. If the veteran was exposed the presumptive conditions found for Agent Orange exposure apply."
Details.
Agent Orange Compensation [Non-Vietnam]: Until recently, the VA would grant compensation to veterans exposed to Agent Orange (AO) outside of Vietnam only if the claimant proved exposure to AO and provided a medical connection between the current disease and that exposure. VA is making an effort to equalize the treatment of all veterans exposed to AO. They recently announced that if exposure outside of Vietnam were proven, and the veteran had one of the ten diseases presumed by law to be related to exposure to AO, the medical connection would be presumed and the claim granted unless there were other disqualifying factors. This was noted in comments on the final rule adding diabetes to the list of ?AO diseases? in 38 C.F.R. ? 3.309(e), at 66 Federal Register, page 23, 166 (May 8, 2001). In addition, any veteran concerned about exposure to AO during use, manufacture, testing or transport outside of Vietnam, may be given an AO physical by the VA and added to the Agent Orange Registry (VHA Directive 2000-027).
The only real issue is proving exposure. All persons who served in Vietnam are presumed to have been exposed. The VA is determining whether Department of Defense information is sufficient to add some non-Vietnam units to the presumptive exposure list, but none have been added as of June 2001. The following areas outside of Vietnam have been confirmed as places where AO was used:
1. The Korean demilitarized zone in 1968 and 1969 (extensive spraying).
2. Fort Drum, NY in 1959 (testing).
Other areas where veterans allege AO to have been sprayed include:
1. Guam from 1955 through 1960s (spraying).
2. Johnston Atoll (1972-197 was used for unused AO storage.
3. Panama Canal Zone from 1960s to early 1970s (spraying).
4. Elgin AFB (Agents Orange and Blue) on Firing Range and Viet Cong Village
5. Wright-Patterson AFB (OH) and Kelly AFB (TX)
Please note the above list does not include use in Thailand. Slip?
FOR RELEASE: May 9, 2003
Evans Asks Secretary Rumsfeld for Information Concerning Agent Orange and
Similar Herbicide Usage in Guam, Cambodia, Laos, Thailand, Puerto Rico and
Various Locations in the United States
Veterans Need Access to Information to Establish VA Claims Related to
Herbicide Exposure
Evans also asked the Secretary for an assessment of the use, testing or
storage of Agent Orange, Agent Blue, Agent Purple, Agent White or other
herbicides which contain dioxin at locations in Cambodia, Laos, Thailand,
Puerto Rico and various locations in the United States. U.S. locations
include sites in Maryland, Florida, Texas, California, Georgia, Mississippi,
Hawaii, Rhode Island, Pennsylvania, Arizona and Washington. Evans cautions
that the amount of herbicides used in some of these locations may have been
small amounts for short term testing and may present no danger to
populations.
Evans notes that veterans who are claiming service-connection of
disabilities which have been associated with herbicide exposure have had
serious difficulty in proving exposure. "If the Department of Defense has
evidence that herbicides were used in particular areas, during specific
periods of time, that information should be made public so that affected
veterans may receive appropriate assistance in establishing their claims,"
said Evans. Evans complained, "It is more than 30 years since many of the
herbicides were used, yet veterans are still having claims denied because
the Department of Defense has not been forthcoming with information
concerning the locations where veterans may have been exposed. It is well
past the time for full and open disclosure."
Here's a partial list Lane Evans made to the DOD Secretary Rumsfeld
on May 7, 2003
for locations sprayed with agent orange:
Kauai, Hawaii
Kingston, Rhode Island
Kompong Cham Province, Cambodia
Laos
Las Marias, Puerto Rico
Las Mesas Cerros and La Jugua, Mayaguez, Puerto Rico
Loquillo, Puerto Rico
Mauna Loa, Hilo, Hawaii
Operation PACER HO (Disposal at sea)
Pinal Mountains, Globe, Arizona
Pranburi and other locations in Thailand
Prosser, Washington
Rio Grande, Puerto Rico
Wayside and Wilcox, Mississippi
I would appreciate a response to this letter by June 13, 2003. If you have
any questions about this request, please contact Mary Ellen Mc Carthy,
Democratic Staff Director, Subcommittee on Benefits. Thank you for your
efforts to improve services to our Nation's veterans.
Sincerely,
LANE EVANS
Ranking Democratic Member
cc: The Honorable Anthony J. Principi
The Honorable Daniel L. Cooper
Anyone -- for a vacation in Hawaii ?! No ..
"Admiral Elmo Zumwalt, commander of U.S. Navy in Vietnam and member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, charged that the government's exoneration of Agent Orange was ?politically motivated to cover up the true effects of dioxin, and manipulate public perception.?"
Details.
Anyone feel like they've been "kicked in the teeth by a mule"???
Yeah .. I know the feeling.
Conclusions

Agent orange was used in Thailand, and undoubtedly Laos and Cambodia.
The United States government, in all its wisdom, has decided to limit its liability
to veterans exposed to agent orange and of course, had complications from all sorts
of nasty diseases to very limited groups outside of Vietnam, with a "buy" on those
that have "stepped foot in" or "visited" Vietnam, presumptive (.. under the CFRs.)
To insure this is a moot issue in the courts of law, you can expect no aid from
our allies at/in the Thai government. No way.
As I said earlier, I was with the army engineers in Thailand. Our
camps were clear of all jungle and you know they weren't using anything you can
buy at your local supermarket or Home Depot, ie, weed killers.
These were (highly) toxic chemicals that would kill you, evidently.
Someone that was in my engineer unit which I have a rather "low regard" and
will remain anonymous for this research wrote a bulletin board message that
indicates knowledge of agent orange spraying and/or projects while in Thailand:
Quote /
Hi (anonymous)!! I remember you at Korat, Camp USARTHAI.
Also remember you from basic training in Echo-4-2.
I was the candy striper in our barracks. I was just looking over our graduation book
the other day and saw your picture. I am really sorry I haven't replied until now.
Shows how much I get to this web site. (anonymous) said to look here.
Let me know what's up.
I was in the agent orange program for a short time, myself, because they sprayed up at Nakon Phanom
but got out of it because I didn't like government programs.
see ya (anonymous) / Unquote
Interesting? It might have been to the individual requesting information
for his personal claim except, as usual, the individual responding is more "blow" than
dependable and does not give the requesting individual any hope whatsoever .. just more b.s.
Before I continue with some additional website references for your information, let me make
some "space" between the above "hot air" cause I really can't stand the individual.
I just point it out because I agree with his statement about "government programs"
.. in Thailand.
Okay .. got that out of my system.
In 1994, I went back to Thailand and visited a region of Southern Thailand that I was
based in in 1969, just outside of the largest USAF base in-country, U-Tapao.
Now, as we can suspect, there was more than B-52 bombing missions going out of there, and
our army base, under construction by you-know-who (my unit) was across the way.
I could never figure out how the large area of land was so clean and clear of jungle.
The puzzle has never been answered, even in 1994 when I returned to find massive
jungle over-growth. I mean, in 1969, you could see from the main gate almost
to the ocean several kilometers away. And, btw, the above bulletin board
message and time of service was either 1967 or 1968 and not early 60's as in the personal
claim referenced above in the VA Appeal Court.
I was touring Thailand, and yes -- visited Korat, Udorn and NKP to find (as you would suspect)
major jungle over-growth. In fact, NKP was closed and not used and the local
Thais told me that there was nothing (really) to see there today. Back to
Satahip, in Southern Thailand, .. where Hua Hin and Pattaya Beach is too, you have major
growth of the town and then jungle. I guess the Thai don't want to spray
much anymore, or at all.
In fact, giving my guide directions to my old camp, Camp Samae San, we passed the place
twice. I was looking for the new billeting that we were involved in
constructing, including "plumbing" (no shit) .. pipelines along with the 538th Engineer
Battalion, I believe Companys C and D, but they were hidden from the main gate by
jungle. No. They weren't far from the main gate, just
hidden.
The Thai Army which resides there now wouldn't let me passed the visitors entry point,
or take photos and at the time, I didn't think much of it. I pointed to
a memorial monument to Thai veterans and asked if I could take a picture .. nope.
I didn't "smell a rat" than, but looking back, it seems suspicious now.
[NEWS ITEM/10-31-05 U.S. holds terrorist prisoners in Thailand..]
Outside the gate, on the main road in front of the army camp, I did (hiding my camera)
take some video and then went down a beach road along the camp to get glimpses
(thru the jungle) of the motor pool, some buildings, whatever I could for this
memorial trip.

"Jungle happens .."
Thailand is in a very tropical part of the world, like Vietnam (a few hundred, at most,
miles away.) You don't spray .. somethin -- you bet it will
consume everything in site.
I would swear that there wasn't an army or air force installation
we either built or put up petrol tanks for our air force didn't use the shit.
If you sense a little "attitude" here, ie, pissed off -- don't expect a check in the
mail!
You're damn right I pissed off ! Having diabetes
and cronic kidney disease .. that's spelled d-i-a-l-y-s-i-s for the
uninformed, you would be too.
If any one has any evidence of agent orange use in Thailand, for those veterans
being abused-to-death, I'd appreciate a "head's up."
(702) 363-3290 or
email here.
Oh -- and for those that don't know what jungles really look like, here's a photo
with an airplane flying low spraying that shit, courtesy of
DiggerHistory.com.
Jungles of S.E.A. (Southeast Asia)
Do read the
DiggerHistory.com.
reference material.
Here's a quote for your information provided with the above photo:
"A light plane sprays some of the 19 million gallons of defoliant used in Viet Nam. Each plane could destroy 350 acres of forest per run. A spray run took less than 4 minutes, used 1,000 gallons of Agent Orange and was often sprayed by 3 planes flying side by side. That meant 1 run equaled 1,000 acres of jungle destroyed."
Thailand Scandal
(Limited to 1964-65) .. common sense .. jungles grow back faster than
that and when I was there in 1968 (January) until January, 1970 .. the jungles were
cleared back and I do remember mosquito spraying and the odd smell, but do not have
recollection of defoliant spraying (personally and honestly.)
Continue

"Among these methods was “defoliating jungle growth along selected routes,” using herbicides such as Agent Orange “to improve visibility.”[2] Already being sprayed in South Vietnam, herbicides had a military purpose of clearing land around roads and trails so that enemy movements could be detected and stopped. The environmental and human consequences never entered the calculation; nor, with few exceptions, did the international legality of spraying ever trouble American leaders. By far the greater concern was preservation of secrecy, in case evidence of chemical use might be turned to Communist propaganda advantage."
This is a document of evidence on Laos. That's right .. borders Thailand
and where until de-classification of the (literally) "Secret War" in Laos (1992-93,)
was not acknowledged by the U.S. government either.
For article details,
"Agent Orange in Laos: Documentary Evidence"
Footnote Ref #2:
Jacob Van Staaveren, Interdiction in Southern Laos 1960-68 (Washington: Center for Air Force History, 1993), p. 96.
"Declassified documents do record the aircraft used for Air Force operations: mostly C-123s from the Ranch Hand operations in South Vietnam, as well as a limited number of F-4s. Both types were flown from Bien Hoa air base as well as off ships in the South China Sea.
At one point, military authorities proposed establishing a Thailand-based spray capability;[10] whether this ever occurred is unknown, although herbicide tests were conducted at Thai air bases as early as 1964-65.[11]"
Footnotes:
[10] Agenda Item for SEACORD meeting, August 19, 1969; Disposition Form to Chief of Staff, Subject: Defoliation Operation, January 18, 1969 (declassified).
[11] Deutsche Presse-Agentur (Bangkok), “United States denies Thai dumpsite contains Agent Orange,” April 22, 1999.
FYI, this article was written in an "expanded version" August, 2002 by Andrew Wells-Dang.
I'd say a few years after "the cat was let out of the bag."
In govt-lingo, that's "de-classified."

"Whether defoliation continued after 1970 remains an open question. As a result of increased public outcry, restrictions began to be placed on herbicide use by the US military. In March 1971, Secretary of Defense Melvin Laird requested that he personally approve any herbicide operations in “Laos, Cambodia, or Thailand.”[31] Air Force records show that UC-123 planes, whose sole purpose had been listed as “defoliation,” conducted 860 sorties over Laos from January-June 1971, but no further details are given.[32]"
Footnotes:
[31] Buckingham, p. 178.
[32] 7th Air Force, Monthly Command Status Reports, June 1969-December 1970 (declassified).
Well, that's got me sprayed .. I mean, "covered." .. January, 1970.
.. none of this "early 60's b.s."
.. a reference to Footnote [10] and the quote above, in red .. 1964-65 .. right.
"Also unconfirmed is herbicide use by Air America or the CIA, whose records are still closed.[33] In an April 1968 interview, the vice-president of Air America declared that his company had been contracted by the Department of Defense to defoliate vegetation in Vietnam, Laos, and southern Thailand, based from the Udon Thani airbase.[34] The 1971-3 opium destruction missions were probably carried out on this basis, and secondary sources also report that the CIA had spray mission capability.[35] Air Force records do not list any UC-123 aircraft at Udon Thani during this period, suggesting that other aircraft might have been used; however, 7 UC-123’s were present at the Nakhon Phanom airbase in 1970 and 1971, presumably for defoliation purposes.[36] Further research is needed to confirm the extent of additional herbicide use in Laos."
Footnotes:
[33] For more information on missing data, see Andrew Wells-Dang, Roger Rumpf, and Jacqui Chagnon, “The Secret Spraying of Herbicides in Laos and Cambodia,” Interchange, Spring 2002 (http://www.ffrd.org/indochina/news.html#herbicides).
[34] Jacques Decornoy, “Une compagnie privee americaine participe a la lutte contra la guerilla,” Le Monde (Paris), April 20, 1968, p. 2.
[35] Robert Kaylor, “Despite Critics, Defoliation Continues in Vietnam,” Los Angeles Times, January 4, 1970, p. E10.
[36] 7th Air Force, Monthly Command Status Reports, June 1969-December 1970.

As pointed out in many of these quotes, the information was classified and when this
was written in 2002, still classified. Doesn't that tell you
something about who we are dealing with here? Evidence .. get real.
For more references:
Agent Orange/Herbicides Used Outside of Vietnam
Some duplication from previous articles, but still good (pointing out memos
by Congressman Dale Evans)
Agent Orange Found at Thai Airport
Another reference @ Hua Hin (Southern Thailand)
Thailand Wants US to Clean up its Toxic Mess
WASHINGTON INDOCHINA UPDATE
July-August, 2005

Good article on "breathing new air into Vietnamese Class-Action lawsuit.
CBS News Online
INDEPTH: AGENT ORANGE
"Deadly defoliants" (June 14, 2005)
2005 is looking up.
And, here's a surprising reference !!!
Jack's Corner !
Jack is someone I like to think of as a friend, even though he's republican.
.. he know not what --
Jack was a company clerk in Korat and was fortunate enough to serve several
tours in Bangkok in the 60's. I guess I can take (some) credit for
getting Jack started, with his website(s). But, I have to hand it to
him, he really took off ! I'm glad he started his USARSUPTHAI
message board and I found it thru Google
Thanks, buddy .. from here in Vegas to Greenway, Arkansas.
Another message board bulletin @ Military dot-com
AO Thread/Articles
I am the child of a Vietnam Veteran who served in Thailand in 1967-1968.
Response by Dave Barker / AMVETS,
more on agent orange.
There's a lot of interesting information to be found there, but something that really
pisses me off is how VAO denies claims to "insulin-dependent" diabetics.
It's bull shit ! Every type II diabetic will eventually become dependent
on insulin for survival. It's like dialysis: something you can look forward
to. As diabetes, aka type II, progresses -- your organs break down more
and oral medication will not suffice. I know -- I started with
oral shit and it is all in my VAMC MRs (medical records.)
Now, I'm sure the government would overturn my opinion -- especially
for those that do not have evidence of type II w/oral meds. Get a damn
physician that understands the disease and appeal. They will owe you back
pay (retro) to (at least) when you filed your original claim or even before for
"misinformation," a legal cause of action.
Read on, thanks Dave.
Now, this next reference deserves a drum roll, please ..
From the Vietnamese News Agency - tons of article links too ..
Overseas Vietnamese in Thailand raise funds for AO victims
And, for posterity, quote /
"Ha Noi, June 17 (VNA) - Overseas Vietnamese in Thailand have raised almost 20,000 USD to support Agent Orange victims in their homeland.
The money was handed over to Prof. Dr. Tran Xuan Thu, Vice President and Secretary General of the Association of Vietnamese Agent Orange Victims, by Le Duc Luu, President of the Foreign Ministry's Trade Union, in Ha Noi on June 17.
Luu said that this valuable and compassionate donation by the Vietnamese community in Thailand will partly help AO victims overcome their difficulties and suffering.-Enditem
American scholar stresses health care for AO victims (10/26/2005)
British organizations call for US responsibilities for AO victims (10/08/2005)
Twenty nine US lawyers to represent Agent Orange victims in lawsuit (10/08/2005)
Vietnamese AO victims determined to pursue lawsuit against US companies (27/7/2005)
US scientists help explain dioxin consequences in Viet Nam (18/7/2005)
American veterans speak about Agent Orange used during Viet Nam war (18/5/2005)
American journalist: Connection between Agent Orange and victims is clear
The US cannot ignore grief of Vietnamese Agent Orange victims (5/5/2005)
US must be held responsible for Vietnamese AO victims, say Russian scientists (12/4/2005)
American vets disappointed by Judge Weinstein's ruling (30/3/2005)
US court's ruling cannot hide the truth about AO victims (21/3/2005)
Judge Weinstein's ruling - travesty of justice (21/3/2005)
Americans work on Vietnamese Agent Orange victims' side (08/3/2005)
AO victims expects US court's fair ruling (23/2/2005)
-- Boy, were they wrong.
US firms should be liable for damage of dioxin to Viet Nam (17/2/2005)
-- lotsa luck, babe.
Viet Now Magazine on AO
I'll leave my work today with a
TVVET's Thread.
Please email or phone updates to (702) 363-3290 or
email here.
Several more cases that went to VA Appeal Board -
Thailand/AO Claim,
Case #2,
Case #3,
Case #4,
Case #5,
and
Case #6.
"Evidence of Service in Vietnam"
Synopsis of a VA Appeal
initially referenced for
important findings therein. If you aren't good with legalese, ie, terms
-- give me a call.
Your buddy, Franco Picchione, US Army '66 - 77.
|